top of page

Skating, Anti-Skating & Waterskiing

Updated: May 15, 2023

There is much confusion about skating forces and anti-skating compensation among audiophiles and even in the audiophile media. There have been respected manufacturers of tonearms claiming that skating forces are not important enough to deal with or that any anti-skating compensation will negatively affect the performance. There have been - and still are - incorrect explanations of skating/anti-skating on several audiophile and tonearm manufacturer websites. When the explanations have been accurate, they are often couched in terminology not familiar to those without a solid understanding of physics. WAM Engineering proposes a simple analogy that will make it easy to understand skating forces. We won't go into the REASONS for skating forces and what causes it as that is often where people fall asleep. Instead, we offer a scenario that many of you have experienced and we hope will help your understanding of what is at play here. THE EXAMPLE Have you ever been water skiing or wake boarding? If so, you probably remember that while being towed by the boat the easiest place to ski that demands the lowest amount of your energy to hold your position is found right on top of a straight line defined by the direction of the boat - DIRECTLY behind the boat. When you swing out to one side of the wake or the other and try to hold your position outside the wake of the boat, you have to spend energy to resist the force that is trying to put you back on that straight line that runs directly behind the boat in the direction of its travel.  The force that is pulling you back to the point directly behind the boat is a skating force. Your effort to turn away from that force, leaning hard to one direction so you can stay far outside of the wake is an anti-skating force. Significant skating force is not generated by the offset angle, as is often incorrectly claimed, but is primarily a function of the friction generated in the groove by the stylus and the location of the tonearm pivot point - which is NOT on the straight line defined by the tangent to the groove the stylus is tracking. (A tangent to a circle is a line that just touches a circle at one point and where a line drawn at that point to the center of the circle is perpendicular to the line.

Imagine that the tonearm pivot point is the boat, the stylus is the skier and a line defined by the tonearm pivot point and the spindle is the center line of the wake of the boat. As the distance between the stylus (skier) and the straight line defined by the pivot point and the spindle (center of the boat wake) increases, skating forces also increase. As the skier moves back toward the center of the wake, skating forces decrease until they reach zero in the center of the wake. While the above description of skating force in vinyl playback is incomplete, it is certainly sufficient for purposes of making the general principles more accessible to the average audiophile. Videos and a "deeper dive" article coming soon that will help you understand it in its entirety! WATCH SKATING FORCE IN ACTION - *EXTREME CAUTION REQUIRED* If you have a record with no grooves or run out grooves pressed on it you can see this force in action for yourself. (Classic Records did a few 45rpm pressings in this manner in the late 90s to early 00s). *BE FOREWARNED THAT THIS PROCEDURE COULD RESULT IN SEVERE DAMAGE TO YOUR CARTRIDGE AND WALLET IF YOU ARE NOT CAREFUL*  Turn your amplifier OFF. Re-confirm that your platter is level using a small bubble level. Initially, set your anti-skating at least mid-range in order to keep the stylus from flying too fast toward the center in this process. With the record turning no more than 33rpm, lower the stylus at the outer edge and watch it skate toward the label. Be ready to catch the arm before it gets too close to the label. Notice that the velocity slows as the stylus gets closer to the center of the record. Decrease your anti-skating a bit more and notice the difference in velocity and the change in velocity as it approaches the label. Now disengage the anti-skating entirely and lower the stylus onto the record at a point about 1.5 inches from the label. Notice the velocity with which it approaches the label. Compare this velocity with what you see when you lower the stylus at the very outer edge of the record and watch how fast it travels the same distance of about 1.5 inches. You may notice the stylus picks up inward velocity faster if you lower it at the outer area versus the inner area of the "playing" surface. This is happening because the skating forces are more powerful further away from the center of the record. If you don't see this in action and your anti-skating is disengaged there may be something wrong with your tonearm's horizontal bearing. Check this on a WallySkater. Now look at your blank record in bright light and notice the micro groove you have just etched in the record surface. CLEAN YOUR STYLUS! WHY DO WE NEED TO APPLY AN ANTI-SKATING FORCE? Since skating forces generated on the stylus as it travels through the record groove cause the cantilever lean hard toward the center of the record. The following issues are created:

  1. Uneven stylus wear and premature stylus aging

  2. Increased likelihood of mis-tracking on the right groove (right channel) can result in damage to that groove during mis-tracking and the higher forces the left groove sees can cause its own wear problems. 

  3. Misalignment of the stylus contact edges. Right channel will lead the left channel in time, causing a slight phase shift between channels that is audible as a general deterioration of overall clarity to the sonic picture.

  4. The cartridge's coil damper is subjected to a 6:1 lever force due to the length ratio between the cantilever and coil former. For every 1 unit of horizontal force against the stylus, the damper will see 6 times that force asymmetrically applied to it. For example, with no anti-skating force, the stylus will see about 10% of the VTF (on average) applied as a skating force. That is 0.2 grams. That doesn't seem like much, but when you consider the 6:1 lever force, it becomes 1.2 grams of force applied to one side of the damper and -1.2 grams of force on the other side of the damper. The coil damper is NOT designed to function under an asymmetric force.

When the horizontal forces in the tonearm are balanced by having the right amount of anti-skate force applied (and no bearing stiction!) the sonic performance improves considerably. The soundstage opens up and the music has a greater clarity and breath to it. Things sound just much more "relaxed" and less electronic sounding.

HOW TO APPLY THE RIGHT AMOUNT OF ANTI-SKATING FORCE? The perfect amount of anti-skating force varies depending upon the distance of the stylus to the center of the record, vertical tracking force, the amplitude of the music being played, the playing speed, stylus profile, the type of anti-skating mechanism being used, the alignment of the cantilever with the groove, etc. In other words, there is no PERFECT amount of anti-skating. A compromise must be struck. By applying anti-skating as a percentage of vertical tracking force you can get to an excellent compromised "average" in your anti-skating across most of the record surface for most music at normal playing speeds.  And so, was born, the WallySkater The WallySkater is not only useful for measuring anti-skating - and is the only product of its type known to us - but is also very useful for learning about your tonearm's horizontal bearing quality and whether you have any unwanted horizontal forces on your tonearm applied by your tonearm wiring.  IMPORTANT: Using a blank record or the groove-less area of the inner run-out on a record to adjust anti-skating so that the tonearm remains stationary is not a recommended method to adjust anti-skating as it results in about 50% too much anti-skating force applied. A FAR WORSE method is the use of "anti-skating bias tracks" found on some test records. The high amplitude such tracks are made at will result in applying far too much anti-skating force and the premature death of your stylus and precious records. At the end of the day, the final litmus test of proper anti-skating application is to have even stylus wear over time. This is one of the reasons we inspect our styli regularly under our modified optical microscope. The wear patterns we find confirm the science behind the WallySkater!

7 comments

Recent Posts

See All

7件のコメント


Hi, I was interested to understand how the 10:1 ratio was originally determined. Is that just the spec from turntable/cartridge manufacturers? You always just see the basic guidance to match the VTF on a dial or use a certain mark etc. Are those different settings always just targeting ~10:1 based on tracking force? Also, what is an acceptable change when measuring inner vs. outer anti-skate force? Should it be the same 10:1 ratio on the inner area? I understand it varies. Thank you in advance.

いいね!
返信先

There were two research papers done on skating force in the 60's/70's. One was done by Shure, I believe. I cannot recall the other one right now. They both concluded that skating force is - on average - about 10% of VTF. Some tonearm manufacturers calibrate their anti-skating mechanisms to this standard so if you have 2.0gm VTF, you just adjust the anti-skate to 2.0 and it should be good.


Acceptable change from inner vs. outer area - 2-3% tops. Skating force is actually a parabolic function (higher at outer and inner and lower in the center). I know of only one tonearm manufacturer that claims to have a parabolic anti-skate function - Acoustic Signature. However, such technology is certainly…

いいね!

I cannot imagine anyone would want an anti-skate force to equal the downward force. OUCH! That would be very damaging to your stylus and records. At a 1:1 ratio, you would very easily see your cantilever skewed horizontally when on the record surface. You would also need a different tool than the WallySkater to measure 100% as it would be “way off the scales“! Perhaps you are referring to tonearms that have instructions to set the anti-skate setting to “2” if your VTF is at 2.0 grams or set the anti-skate setting to 1.5 if your VTF is at 1.5 grams and so on. If so, know that this relationship should be at a 10:1 ratio. These “calibrated” anti-skate mechanism…

いいね!

Thanks a lot for publish the number! But only 9/10/11% of vtf?? Most manufacturerers suggest an anti-skating of the same value as the vertical tracking force.

いいね!

Hi Atle! The answer depends upon several factors. We are beginning the initial stages of a coefficient of friction test in which we can determine what adjustments need to be made for your targeted anti-skating depending upon your stylus profile, musical genre preferences, record treatment applications and so on. When we have those results, we will release them to every WallySkater owner so they can refine the settings. For now, if you have a 12 inch arm, aim for 9%. If you have a 9 inch arm aim for 11%. If you have an arm in between those lengths aim for 10%

いいね!

»By applying anti-skating as a percentage of vertical tracking force you can get to an excellent compromised "average" in your anti-skating across most of the record surface for most music at normal playing speeds.«


So....what’s the magic percentage value?? :-)

いいね!
bottom of page